|
|
 |
| |
It is widely accepted that human disturbances have altered
the form and function of the ecological landscape in the
southwestern United States. A tremendous amount of energy
has been expended in a cycle of blame and denial, an exercise
with little ecological significance. Many people believe
that if the cause of the change can be identified and
removed then these landscapes will return to their pre-disturbance
conditions. Unfortunately, this does not hold true for
ecological systems. We have learned that ecological systems
have thresholds, and that once a system has moved through
a threshold, "recovery" to a previous condition
is not a linear event. Thus the removal of a disturbance
such as livestock grazing from a landscape dominated by
brush will probably not lead to a change back to its original
condition as a grassland.
Although the concept of restoration is not a reliable
goal, we can still improve or remediate our landscapes.
The goal of remediation is to change the function and
form of ecological systems and bring them closer to a
desired condition. The desired condition is often expressed
in terms of biodiversity or ecological process such as
watershed function or recovery mechanisms. Although many
people are not comfortable with this anthropocentric definition,
it is practical and useful. In the practice of remediation
the past only offers a hazy picture of potential future
conditions, what is truly important is the current conditions.
|
|
 |
| |
By definition, remediation requires the expenditure of
human time, money and labor. Because of the inherent constraint
on these resources, remediation efforts need to be focused
on opportunities that will yield the greatest results
for the resources expended. This leads us to the concept
of a trigger site.
A trigger site is a landscape location or a remediation
opportunity where a human disturbance will spread and
trigger a chain reaction of positive ecological change.
These are often physical areas with the potential of being
moved through a threshold because they have a higher than
average concentration of water and nutrients, such as
riparian areas. Trigger sites may also be opportunities
involving keystone species, or species whose reintroduction
or removal will cause a substantial part of the ecological
community to change. Keystone species in our ranches include
mesquite, juniper, salt cedar, beaver, prairie dogs and
wolves.
|
|
 |
| |
These pages describe potential remediation projects categorized
as involving Riparian Areas, Species Reintroduction, Species
Control, and the Alteration of the Distribution of Water
and Nutrients over the Landscape.
|
|
 |
| |
In the southwest, riparian areas (places with exceptional
concentrations of water) are extremely important. Healthy
riparian areas provide habitat, shade, food, water, and
protection to the largest assemblage of species on the
ranches. The vegetation layers, dead trees, and multiple
edges (zones where habitat types come together) of riparian
areas create a mosaic of subhabitats, and support many
different species because they can avoid competition by
using different zones in the vegetation profile. The swampy
water and leafy surfaces attract swarms of insects, which
support birds and bats. Decaying trees contain wood boring
insects that are food for woodpeckers, and provide cavities
that are habitat for squirrels, owls, and other animals.
Riparian areas also function as corridors for ungulates
and their predators, and are staging areas for migrating
bird. The streams provide habitat for fish and amphibians,
as well as water-dependent species such as beaver, ducks,
and geese.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Streams & Arroyos
The main drainages with existing riparian areas or potential
are the Tierra Blanca, Jaralosa, Berrenda and Macho Creeks
located on the Lake Valley, Berrenda and Double Lightening
Ranches. Cougar Mountain Ranch and Deer Canyon Preserve
do not have any drainage with significant riparian potential.
The drainages mentioned run the gamut from perennial flow
areas to ephemeral flow areas to dry arroyos. It is believed
that ephemeral flow areas may be improved to attain perennial
flow and that certain parts of arroyos may show ephemeral
flows.
Remediation efforts in riparian areas will consist of
a livestock grazing regime, pole plantings and improving
some stream structures. The grazing regime is designed
to promote growth of riparian vegetation by: 1) providing
yearlong rest to critical areas, 2) restricting areas
to dormant season use, and 3) limiting growing season
use to brief periods of time. Pole plantings will be limited
to areas that may not be subject to natural colonization
of riparian vegetation because of rapid erosion. Steam
structures, including beaver dams, are intended to pool
water and allow for the deposition of silt. Many areas
have been eroded down to bedrock and will require the
deposition of soil before riparian vegetation may be established.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Wetland Areas
Lake Valley Ranch receives its name from a two shallow
lakes that were drained and put into farmland about a
century ago. Heritage Ranch Institute has initiated a
long term project, with the help of a variety of agencies,
which has taken the lands out of farmland and returned
them to ephemeral wetlands. Historically, the flood flow
from Berrenda Creek filled the wetlands during the monsoon
season. This water remained in the wetland system for
months if not years and slowly soaked into the soil. The
water then resurfaced below the wetlands to initiate the
perennial flow portion of Berrenda Creek. When the land
was put into farming, levees were built which pushed the
flow of water down the drainage eliminating any water
storage capacity.
The goal for these wetlands is to reverse the function
of the levees and return the water capture and storage
function of the area. Towards this end, HRI has participated
with the US Fish & Wildlife Service in the Partners
for Wildlife program and the Natural Resources Conservation
Service in the Wetland Reserve Program. Under the Partners
program we were able to use heavy equipment to change
the function of the levees to dams so that flood waters
now flow into the wetlands which have a storage capacity
of about 400 acre feet. Under the Wetland Reserve Program
we have permanently removed this area from any future,
non-prescriptive, agricultural use. Future remediation
work on these wetlands includes:
* Rehabilitation work under the Wetland Reserve Program
with the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NCRS),
which has allocated $75,000 for work to improve dams and
make potholes.
* Heritage Ranch has applied to the US Fish and Wildlife
Service for a grant to do further wetland restoration
work that compliments the work that has been in planning
with NRCS for the past 3 years. This project includes
creating islands and channels in an old lake bed, and
planting trees (cottonwood, willow) and other vegetation
into the islands, to help create a mature plant community
in a shorter period of time.
* We plan to apply for a larger grant from USFWS to improve
other stretches of Berrenda Creek.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Seeps
All the ranches contain small areas with riparian potential
which may not have any surface flow. These seep areas
can support islands of riparian habitat in places with
no other habitat of this type. The first step in managing
seeps is simply to identify their location. This may only
be possible during wet periods or during a string of wet
years. Seeps can be recognized during dry times by the
presence of historic and prehistoric artifacts and remnant
riparian vegetation. The remnant vegetation may include
deer muhly and sacaton grasses, baccharis bushes, or willow,
cottonwood or hackberry trees.
Once these areas are located, the goal is to increase
riparian vegetation which will shade the area and reduce
evaporation losses. This may be accomplished with changes
to the livestock grazing regime, which may include growing
season rest. Construction of enclosures may be justified
if a seep is located in an area where the overall riparian
potential is not great enough to justify major changes
to the grazing program. In some cases pole plantings may
be accomplished when soil moisture is adequate.
|
|
 |
| |
Beaver Reintroduction
As part of the plan to remediate our riparian areas, we
are planning an experimental beaver reintroduction project.
Beavers are a keystone species because they maintain wetlands
that prevent erosion and flooding, raise the water table,
purify water, and are habitat for many aquatic and aquatic-dependent
species. To create their own habitats, beavers construct
lodges, dams, and canals, which spread a shallow stream
into a pond. When a stream is broken by a series of beaver
dams, the stream becomes a necklace of ponds and marshes.
By slowing the water, streamside plant growth is increased,
attracting insects, aquatic animals, and predators. Beavers
also remove shoreline trees to obtain forage (they eat
the bark and cambium of trees such as willow and poplar).
This allows sunlight to penetrate and encourages growth
of willow and cottonwood seedlings that have been waiting
in the understory. The result is an acceleration of the
aging process of the forest around the beaver ponds.
Beavers are native to pond and lake environments, and
at one time were common throughout the United States.
Because of hunting and trapping they were nearly eliminated
from most of their original habitats. They are currently
listed by BLM as a rare species in Sierra, Hidalgo, Dona
Ana, and Grant Counties. We plan to introduce one or two
adults into either Berrenda or Jarlosa Creek, and monitor
the outcomes. Beavers are extremely industrious, and we
may have to install flow devices to release water from
excessive damming, and some trees may be wrapped with
wire to modify treecutting behavior.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Leopard Frog Reintroduction
The Chiricahua leopard frog is a threatened species, and
is native to Luna, Sierra, Catron, Grant, and Hidalgo
Counties. The frog is very threatened rangewide from water
diversions that cause habitat destruction and fragmentation,
from degraded water quality, and from competition and
depredation from bullfrogs. At this time no Chiricahua
leopard frogs have been observed at the ranches. However,
it is believed that the current conditions of the riparian
areas are sufficient to support populations of the frog.
The chief constraint to a healthy population is believed
to be an abundant population of bullfrogs. Once the bullfrogs
have been controlled, reintroduction of the leopard frog
may be feasible.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Rio Grande Chub Augmentation
This fish occurs in the coolwater reaches of the Rio Grande
and Pecos Rivers, and is found in impoundments and pools
of small streams. Pools connected by rapids are important
habitat, as it spawns in riffles. The greatest threat
to the Rio Grande chub is habitat destruction and channelization,
where riffles needed for breeding are absent.
The perennial portion of Berrenda Creek located on the
Lake Valley Ranch is home to a large population of Rio
Grande suckers. It was thought that this habitat also
offered an opportunity to establish another foothold for
the Rio Grande chub. A biologist working with the Ladder
Ranch visited the site and confirmed this opportunity.
Staff members at the New Mexico Department of Game and
Fish and Ladder Ranch were contracted to arrange a reintroduction.
In February 1999, specimens of the Rio Grande chub were
taken from the Ladder Ranch and released into Berrenda
Creek. In the fall of 1999, several of these fish were
observed to have survived. A structured follow up monitoring
needs to be conducted to verify the success of this early
reintroduction effort and to define the need for additional
augmentation of the population with other reintroductions.
Riparian restoration efforts along Berrenda and Jarlosa
Creeks should be designed to expand habitat for the chub.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Augmentation
The yellow-billed cuckoo is a candidate species for the
threatened and endangered list, and a subspecies, western
yellow-billed cuckoo, is recognized and fully protected
in New Mexico. In the west, the yellow-billed cuckoo inhabits
unfragmented riparian areas, requiring patches of at least
25 acres of riparian forests, nesting in mature willows.
The primary threat to the yellow-billed cuckoo is loss,
degradation, and fragmentation of riparian habitat.
The yellow-billed cuckoo has a good chance of increasing
its numbers if riparian habitats are restored, especially
in sites having an area of at least 100 to 200 acres.
Although riparian habitat has declined an estimated 90
percent in New Mexico, a suitable riparian forest of willows
and cottonwoods exists along the Berrenda Creek, and the
yellow-billed cuckoo is a known inhabitant of this area.
Hawks Aloft, Inc., conducts bird surveys twice each year
at the Lake Valley Ranch, and the yellow-billed cuckoo
is listed as uncommon and nesting. There is an opportunity
to increase the cuckoo population by restoring additional
riparian habitat at Berrenda and Jarlosa Creeks.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Black-tailed Prairie Dog Augmentation
The black-tailed prairie dog is a keystone species that
is critical to the survival of many other species. Prairie
dogs provide burrow habitat for a variety of species including
burrowing owls, mountain plovers, and the black-footed
ferret. The black-tailed prairie dog was extirpated from
southern New Mexico almost 100 years ago (it is a candidate
species for the threatened and endangered list), although
specimens still can be obtained in northern parts of the
state. Historical records describe large populations of
prairie dogs at the Lake Valley area, and inspection of
lowland draw sites reveals large numbers of remnant burrows.
These remnant burrows are seen as a major source of erosion
in these sites.
Two populations of prairie dogs have been reintroduced
to a lowland draw site at Lake Valley Ranch. The first
event, occurring in 2001, was unsuccessful due to excessive
losses to predators. A secondary reintroduction occurring
in 2002 has been more successful. An opportunity exists
to augment the existing population with another reintroduction,
and to place additional populations in similar sites on
the ranch.
For an enlarged view, Click on the picture.
Gunnison's Prairie Dog
Similar to the black-tailed prairie dog, the Gunnison's
| | | |